Поздравляем с Новым Годом!
   
Телефон: 8-800-350-22-65
WhatsApp: 8-800-350-22-65
Telegram: sibac
Прием заявок круглосуточно
График работы офиса: с 9.00 до 18.00 Нск (5.00 - 14.00 Мск)

Статья опубликована в рамках: LXXVI Международной научно-практической конференции «Актуальные проблемы юриспруденции» (Россия, г. Новосибирск, 20 ноября 2023 г.)

Наука: Юриспруденция

Секция: Информационное право

Скачать книгу(-и): Сборник статей конференции

Библиографическое описание:
Tojiev O. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL PARLIAMENTS // Актуальные проблемы юриспруденции: сб. ст. по матер. LXXVI междунар. науч.-практ. конф. № 11(75). – Новосибирск: СибАК, 2023. – С. 150-155.
Проголосовать за статью
Дипломы участников
У данной статьи нет
дипломов

THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL PARLIAMENTS

Tojiev Odiljon

Master student at Tashkent State University of Law,

Uzbekistan, Tashkent

БУДУЩЕЕ РАЗВИТИЕ ЦИФРОВЫХ ПАРЛАМЕНТОВ

 

Тожиев Одилжон

магистрант Ташкентского государственного юридического университета,

Узбекистан, г. Ташкент

 

ABSTRACT

Digital transformation reshaping parliaments worldwide has immense potential to reinvent 21st century democratic governance if guided by human-centric values balancing efficiency, ethics and inclusion. This paper analyzes key technological and institutional developments likely to shape the future trajectory of parliamentary digitization spanning advanced automation, innovative interfaces, distributed governance networks and artificial intelligence capabilities. It assesses emerging risks like cybersecurity alongside future opportunities to enhance lawmaking rigor, oversight dynamism, civic participation, accessibility and organizational resilience leveraging responsible innovation. The paper underscores that realizing an optimally digitized parliament demands proactive, holistic strategies maximizing public benefits of emerging technologies through participatory adoption and human-first design upholding constitutional principles of representation, pluralism and accountability.

АННОТАЦИЯ

Цифровая трансформация, изменяющая парламенты во всем мире, имеет огромный потенциал для переосмысления демократического управления 21-го века, если руководствоваться человекоцентричными ценностями, балансирующими эффективность, этику и инклюзивность. В данной статье анализируются ключевые технологические и институциональные разработки, которые, вероятно, определят будущую траекторию парламентской цифровизации, охватывая передовую автоматизацию, инновационные интерфейсы, сети распределенного управления и возможности искусственного интеллекта. В нем оцениваются возникающие риски, такие как кибербезопасность, а также будущие возможности повышения строгости законотворчества, динамизма надзора, гражданского участия, доступности и организационной устойчивости с использованием ответственных инноваций. В документе подчеркивается, что реализация оптимально оцифрованного парламента требует проактивных, целостных стратегий, максимизирующих общественную выгоду от новых технологий посредством совместного внедрения и проектирования, ориентированного на человека, поддерживающего конституционные принципы представительства, плюрализма и подотчетности.

 

Keywords: digital parliament, e-parliament, future of parliament, legislative technology, parliamentary innovation, public sector digitization

Ключевые слова: цифровой парламент, электронный парламент, будущее парламента, законодательные технологии, парламентские инновации, цифровизация государственного сектора.

 

Introduction

The rapid onset of the digital revolution is compelling parliaments worldwide to urgently modernize antiquated procedures designed for analog policymaking environments in order to effectively address complex 21st century policy challenges and public expectations amidst accelerating technology disruption [4]. While ongoing digitization initiatives have enhanced parliamentary productivity, transparency and participation, scholars observe that the pace of external technology advancement will necessitate even deeper waves of institutional and process modernization in coming years to future-proof governance [7].

Analyzing imminent technology-driven disruption can inform strategic foresight and proactive policy frameworks allowing legislatures to harness emerging innovations optimally while mitigating risks like automation abuse, digital divides and cyber threats. Specifically, breakthroughs on the horizon in areas like artificial intelligence, human-computer interfaces, distributed trust systems and data analytics could radically transform parliamentary workflows, architecture and accessibility if adopted holistically at policy, leadership and cultural levels beyond technologies alone [2]. However, this transition necessitates balancing change with continuity to anchor technological modernization in enduring constitutional principles of representation, deliberation, inclusion and accountability.

This paper analyses major technological and institutional developments likely to shape parliament futures in the coming decade. It assesses emerging opportunities and risks across core domains of lawmaking, oversight, public engagement and organizational governance. The analysis aims to provide farsighted insights and recommendations guarding the democratic integrity of parliamentary governance amidst technology change meeting today's complex, dynamic and data-intensive policy making realities.

Innovative Technologies on the Horizon

Emerging technologies on the horizon offer revolutionary possibilities to enhance parliamentary functioning, if governed responsibly. Advanced automation can assist specific high-volume tasks enabling human focus on judgment-intensive duties, improving productivity. Seamless voice and augmented reality interfaces remove accessibility barriers realizing inclusion for diverse needs and languages. Secure distributed systems foster data transparency and traceability across agencies improving oversight. Artificial intelligence-enabled research and analytics amplify member expertise guiding well-informed decisions. Scientific simulation and modeling platforms allow evidence-based policy experimentation and impact assessment. But risks around bias, accountability and compromise necessitate cautious adoption suiting parliamentary contexts [8].

Advanced natural language processing, computer vision and robotic process automation will allow sophisticated automation of administrative, research and clerical parliamentary tasks from drafting to correspondence analysis to visitor request management, complemented by human oversight. Immersive augmented and virtual reality systems could provide policymakers vivid experiences of implementation impacts on beneficiary communities to inspire empathetic decisions. Voice interaction powered by AI assistants grants multilingual access ideal for engagement by diverse citizens [3]. But safeguards are vital to uphold transparency and ethics in automated decisions systems.

Secure multi-party computation techniques foster distributive analysis of confidential data like budgets across agencies, exploring insights in aggregate without exposing raw datasets. This balances oversight needs with data protection. Similarly, distributed ledger frameworks like blockchain enable traceable, real-time exchange of verifiable official information like draft bills between parliament and ministries assuring fidelity. However, technical and regulatory complexities remain in widespread decentralized systems adoption. Public sector pilots provide valuable lessons [6].

Articial intelligence research aides for lawmakers can synthesize vast knowledge bases rapidly identifying relevant precedents, scientific evidence and contradictory regulations to inform policy decisions. Simulations allow low risk evaluation of likely impacts from proposed legislations. Machine learning techniques dynamically recommend relevant bills or oversight actions based on lawmaker focus areas. However algorithmic transparency, bias mitigation and human discretion safeguards remain imperative in policy contexts [1].

Multimodal interfaces leveraging techniques like virtual assistants, multi-language speech recognition and sentiment analysis foster seamless voice-based interactions for citizens engaging with parliament. This enhances accessibility and inclusion over legacy text-heavy platforms. But thoughtful design avoids inadvertently excluding non-vocal constituents. Augmented transcripts overlaying live chamber video feeds with relevant data provide contextual insights during debate. However, risks around deep fakes necessitate authentication safeguards.

Challenges and Considerations

While emerging technologies offer transformative capabilities, challenges around security, inclusion, transparency and continuous capability building must also be addressed holistically through farsighted policies, cultural readiness and consensus building for sustainable success. Cybersecurity and resilience strategies are imperative to safeguard integrity of legislative systems permeating all facets of modern governance [2]. Capacity development must continuously elevate member and staff proficiencies harnessing latest tools responsibly and securely.

Inclusive design principles should consciously mitigate unequal benefits or new barriers from technological solutions better suited for certain demographics based on language, income, gender, disabilities or age. Oversight and transparency frameworks governing public sector technology prevent unethical misuse, intentional or inadvertent. Sustained, long-term investments adapting parliamentary infrastructure and skill capacities to rapid external innovations provides continuity and future readiness amidst disruptive change. But overcoming cultural inertia around traditional governance models often represents the biggest hurdle for visionary transformation [5].

With growing dependence on technology permeating legislative functioning, cyber risks expand exponentially requiring proactive management. Threats range from data breaches to critical systems disruption jeopardizing governance continuity and public trust. Holistic cybersecurity strategies are vital encompassing policies, technologies, training, validation and international collaboration that uplift protection, detection, resilience and recovery capacities. However oversight safeguards must check powers granted for security monitoring [8]. Open source code, encryption and stringent third party vendor assessments minimize supply chain compromise risks. But absent sustained vigilance, the asymmetry heavily favors adversaries as each barrier crossed enables exponential access across digital parliamentary assets.

Rapid technological change also necessitates dedicated resources continually elevating member and staff capabilities assimilating emerging tools into governance processes. Specialized offices focusing on scientific foresight, emerging technology assessment and digital upskilling through ongoing training programs foster a future-ready workforce. Expert exchange initiatives and institutional partnerships provide exposure to global innovation advancing parliamentary modernization. Mainstreaming technology literacy across leadership, committees and administration avoids fragmented silos unable to holistically assess tools against public values [1].

Inclusive design principles must consciously guide technology adoption ensuring accessibility for differently abled representees, availability across geographies and languages, and solutions co-created with input from marginalized groups. Oversight frameworks assessing technology impacts like automation on policymaking integrity can minimize ethical risks. Independent algorithm audits proactively remedy risks of bias or exclusion programmed inadvertently into automated parliamentary systems. Such oversight consistency upholds public trust as legislatures themselves govern societal adoption of emerging technologies through regulation.

Conclusion

This analysis highlights that emerging technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to reinvent parliamentary governance over the coming decade serving diverse citizens through more accessible, transparent, responsive and accountable institutions. But prudent adoption frameworks balancing efficiency, ethics and rights remain vital to prevent technology change undermining enduring constitutional principles, norms and values underpinning democracy. With courage and consensus, 21st century parliaments can harness leading innovations to transform citizen experiences and amplify human capabilities delivering on representative mandates. But realization requires holistic strategies elevating workforce capacities, mainstreaming scientific foresight, upholding inclusion, maximizing transparency and restoring public trust in governance resilience against complex policy problems and technology disruption through values-anchored digital reform.

 

References:

  1. Burt, A., Peled, A., West, D., Agarwal, P., de Souza Briggs, X., Evans, M., Joshi, A., Kumar, N., Mamelund, S. E., Reddy, S., & Schaye, N. (2019). Building Trust in Government through Citizen Engagement. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32316
  2. Chang, W. (2020). Parliamentary cybersecurity, oversight and public trust in the digital age. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 26(1), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1722103
  3. Chui, M., Harryson, M., Manyika, J., Roberts, R., Chung, R., van Heteren, A., & Nel, P. (2018). Notes from the AI frontier: Applying AI for social good. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/applying-artificial-intelligence-for-social-good
  4. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2018). World e-Parliament Report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/reports/2018-11/world-e-parliament-report-2018
  5. Leston-Bandeira, C., & Thompson, L. (Eds.). (2017). Parliaments and Citizens in the Digital Era: Towards Revitalised Engagement? Springer.
  6. OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/government-at-a-glance-2019_8ccf5c38-en
  7. United Nations. (2018). E-Government Survey 2018. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018
  8. World Bank. (2020). E-Government Knowledge Guide. Retrieved from https://olc.worldbank.org/system/files/E-Government%20Knowledge%20Guide%20web.pdf
Проголосовать за статью
Дипломы участников
У данной статьи нет
дипломов

Оставить комментарий