IMPROVING THE ORGANIZATION OF PALLIATIVE CARE FOR ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 3 IN KAZAKHSTAN

Introduction

Cancer remains a major contributor to the global burden of disease. It is growing. In lower-middle-income countries, the impact is amplified by late diagnosis and limited access to treatment, resulting in a higher demand for palliative care [1]. However, healthcare systems in these settings often prioritize curative interventions. Palliative care comes late.

In Kazakhstan, the institutional framework for palliative care has been established over the past decade [2]. National programs and regulatory documents formally recognize its importance [3]. Yet, implementation gaps persist. Especially at the district level. For example, rural populations face barriers related to distance, workforce shortages, and limited continuity of care [4].

Previous studies in Asia-Pacific settings highlight similar challenges [5]. These include fragmented service integration, insufficient training, and underdeveloped home-based care. However, country-specific evidence remains scarce [6]. Particularly for Central Asia [7].

This study aims to fill this gap. It presents empirical data from a rural healthcare setting and proposes a context-adapted model to improve the organization of palliative care services.

Methods

A mixed-methods design was used. It allowed a comprehensive assessment. The study was conducted at Baizak District Central Hospital, a representative rural healthcare facility in southern Kazakhstan.

The quantitative component included a structured survey of 144 respondents: 68 patients, 52 caregivers, and 24 healthcare providers. The questionnaire covered accessibility, quality of care, symptom management, and satisfaction.

The qualitative component involved semi-structured interviews. These explored barriers in service delivery, coordination gaps, and provider perspectives.

Additionally, a health system analysis was performed using SWOT and PEST frameworks. This enabled the identification of structural and contextual factors influencing service organization.

Data were analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were applied. Associations between accessibility and satisfaction were examined.

Results

The findings reveal a fragmented system. Accessibility is uneven. Only 32% of respondents reported full access to palliative care services, while 48% experienced partial access and 20% reported significant barriers.

Quality of care was rated as moderate. Only 28% of participants considered it high. Pain management remains a concern. About 22% of patients reported inadequate pain control, indicating gaps in clinical practice and resource availability.

Psychosocial support is the weakest component. More than half of respondents (55%) reported not receiving any structured psychological assistance. This reflects the absence of multidisciplinary teams.

Satisfaction levels varied. They were strongly linked to accessibility. For example, among patients with high access, satisfaction reached over 60%, whereas it dropped significantly in low-access groups.

System analysis confirmed key barriers. These include workforce shortages, poor integration between primary and specialized care, and limited outreach services.

Discussion

The study highlights systemic challenges in organizing palliative care. These are not unique. Similar patterns are observed in other lower-middle-income settings. However, the rural context intensifies these issues.

Fragmentation of care is a central problem. Patients often fall through the cracks between hospital discharge and primary care follow-up. This disrupts continuity.

The dominance of biomedical models further limits holistic care. Psychosocial and spiritual needs remain under-addressed. This aligns with findings from global oncology reports.

Importantly, many of these issues are manageable. They are not purely resource-dependent. Organizational improvements can have a significant impact.

Conclusion

Palliative care services in Kazakhstan are evolving. But gaps remain. Accessibility, quality, and integration need improvement.

The proposed model offers a feasible pathway. It is adaptable. And relevant for similar settings.

References:

1. Nilsen ML, Johnson JT. Potential for low-value palliative care of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):e284-e289. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30260-7. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2. Silva MD, Schack EE. Outpatient Palliative Care Practice for Cancer Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic: Benefits and Barriers of Using Telemedicine. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jul;38(7):842-844. doi: 10.1177/1049909121997358. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3. Brant JM, Fink RM, Thompson C, Li YH, Rassouli M, Majima T, Osuka T, Gafer N, Ayden A, Khader K, Lascar E, Tang L, Nestoros S, Abdullah M, Michael N, Cerruti J, Ngaho E, Kadig Y, Hablas M, Istambouli R, Muckaden MA, Ali MN, Aligolshvili B, Obeidat R, Kunirova G, Al-Omari M, Qadire M, Omran S, Mouhawej MC, Zouak M, Ghrayeb I, Manasrah N, Youssef A, Ortega PF, Tuncel Oguz G, Cajucona LA, Leaphart K, Day A, Silbermann M. Global Survey of the Roles, Satisfaction, and Barriers of Home Health Care Nurses on the Provision of Palliative Care. J Palliat Med. 2019 Aug;22(8):945-960. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0566.
4. Li S, Lu G, Shen Y, Ye J, Ji J. A qualitative study on the experience of internet outpatient consultation in palliative care for relatives of cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 4;24(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01732-3.
5. Latino NJ, Galotti M, Cherny NI, de Vries EGE, Douillard JY, Kaidarova D, Ilbawi A. Prioritising systemic cancer therapies applying ESMO's tools and other resources to assist in improving cancer care globally: the Kazakh experience. ESMO Open. 2022 Feb;7(1):100362. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100362. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6. Alibek S, Kuralbay K, Abylai B, Olzhas Z, Nazerke A, Maiya Z, Magripa B, Gulnara K, Galiya A, Dinara M. Transformation of the private healthcare sector in the Republic of Kazakhstan following healthcare reforms. Front Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;13:1608557. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1608557.
7. Kimatova K, Yermukhanova L, Talarska D, Dworacka M, Sultanova G, Sarsenbayeva G, Bazargaliyev Y, Aitmaganbet P, Suwalska A, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Philp I, Tobis S. Needs of older adults in Kazakhstan: analysis and psychometric properties of the localized version of the EASYCare standard 2010 instrument. Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;13:1487827. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1487827.