Поздравляем с Новым Годом!
   
Телефон: 8-800-350-22-65
Напишите нам:
WhatsApp:
Telegram:
MAX:
Прием заявок круглосуточно
График работы офиса: с 9.00 до 18.00 Нск (5.00 - 14.00 Мск)

Статья опубликована в рамках: Научного журнала «Студенческий» № 39(335)

Рубрика журнала: Экономика

Скачать книгу(-и): скачать журнал часть 1, скачать журнал часть 2, скачать журнал часть 3, скачать журнал часть 4, скачать журнал часть 5, скачать журнал часть 6, скачать журнал часть 7, скачать журнал часть 8, скачать журнал часть 9

Библиографическое описание:
Putina E.V., Kostyleva K.S. MOVING BEYOND VENTURE CAPITAL. OTHER FUNDING OPTIONS FOR STARTUPS TODAY // Студенческий: электрон. научн. журн. 2025. № 39(335). URL: https://sibac.info/journal/student/335/393315 (дата обращения: 03.01.2026).

MOVING BEYOND VENTURE CAPITAL. OTHER FUNDING OPTIONS FOR STARTUPS TODAY

Putina Elizaveta Vitalievna

Student, Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University,

Russia, St. Petersburg

Kostyleva Kamila Sergeevna

Student, Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University,

Russia, St. Petersburg

ABSTRACT

The article analyzes the increasing popularity of alternative funding sources for startups beyond traditional venture capital. Entrepreneurs are increasingly seeking flexible methods like equity crowdfunding, token-based financing, revenue-based financing (RBF), and grants. Equity crowdfunding allows fundraising from a broad audience, while RBF offers a hybrid model without equity dilution, linked to sales. Grants provide non-dilutive funding, validating innovation but requiring application effort. The optimal choice depends on strategic objectives, capital costs, and administrative burdens. More information on this analysis is available in the article.

 

Keywords: Venture Capital, Startups, Alternative Funding Options, Equity Crowdfunding, Token-based Financing, Blockchain, Revenue-based Financing, Grants, Equity Dilution, Regulation, Business Models, Entrepreneurship.

 

The startup financing landscape is undergoing a significant transformation, moving beyond traditional venture capital. Since 2020, the use of alternative funding methods has grown by nearly 47%, reflecting a more mature and diverse ecosystem that prioritizes flexibility. These new models are particularly valuable for companies with unconventional growth trajectories or strong social missions.

Equity crowdfunding has become a viable alternative to angel networks, with platforms like SeedInvest and CircleUp facilitating over $1.2 billion annually. This approach allows businesses to raise capital from the public, validate their product, and build a loyal community, often increasing customer loyalty by up to 30%. While it requires significant promotional investment and ongoing investor relations, it is ideal for consumer-facing brands with a strong product-market fit.

In the blockchain space, Security Token Offerings (STOs) are projected to reach a $28 billion market by 2026. Unlike the more speculative ICOs, STOs are regulated digital securities requiring strict AML/KYC compliance. The EU's MiCA regulation has reduced market uncertainty by 68%, spurring institutional interest. Successful projects typically allocate 15-20% of funds to community growth and token management.

Revenue-based financing offers a hybrid model where investors receive a percentage of revenue until a cap of 1.3-3.0 times the initial investment is met. Growing at a 54% compound rate since 2021, it allows startups to avoid equity dilution. Leaders like Capchase and Pipe use data analytics to serve companies with steady revenue, typically requiring at least $50,000 monthly and 15% quarterly growth, though it can create cash flow challenges.

Grant funding provides over $45 billion annually from governments and corporations without requiring equity or creating debt, validating a startup's innovation. However, applications are time-consuming (200-400 hours), success rates are below 12%, and spending is restricted. Programs like the European Innovation Council offer up to €17.5 million, and grant recipients have a 42% higher survival rate over five years, though scaling remains difficult.

Choosing the right model involves balancing cost, strategic impact, and administrative load. Equity crowdfunding costs 7-12% in fees and marketing, while revenue-based financing carries an effective annual cost of 18-24%. STOs require $250,000-$500,000 in legal and tech setup but offer global reach. Grants, while financially free, demand substantial preparation time for a low chance of success.

This diversification signals a maturing market where founders seek aligned, flexible capital. While venture capital remains key for capital-intensive scaling, tailored models like revenue-sharing and regulated digital securities are creating a more resilient and aligned funding environment for innovative ventures.

 

Список литературы:

  1. Cremades A. The Art of Startup Fundraising. — Hoboken: Wiley, 2016. — 288 p.
  2. Darajati R., Santoso B., Widhiyanti H. The Legal Aspects of Venture Capital as an Alternative Financing. — 2023. — [электронный ресурс] — URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/the-legal-aspects-of-venture-capital-as-an-alternative-financing/viewer (дата обращения 20.10.2025)
  3.  Mensink T., Mol S. Startup Funding: The Complete Guide to Raising Capital for Your Business. — Amsterdam: Startup Funding Book, 2017. — 214 p.
  4. Momtaz P. Security Token Offerings. — Cham: Springer, 2022. — 85 p.
  5. Voshmgir S. Token Economy: How the Web3 Reinvents the Internet. — BlockchainHub, 2020. — 420 p.

Оставить комментарий